- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 15,146
- Reaction score
- 50,772
- Points
- 391
Linda Harvey: It’s Time For Christians To Establish Biblical And Homosexual-Free Sanctuary Cities
“Since we are beginning to see violations of constitutional rights based on objections to homosexuality as marriage, I believe there’s a clear precedent for establishing sanctuary cities for authentic, lawful, man/woman marriage. Think about how great life would be in those cities. After all, unlike the defiance of immigration law, these cities would be upholding the actual law under our actual Constitution, not the imaginary one in the mind of Justice Anthony Kennedy. So, why not cities that uphold a standing, just law?
“Family life would be much healthier and safer in these cities. Keep out the vile ‘gay-pride’ parades as well as harassment lawsuits against bakers and florists. And how about no pro-homosexual lessons in school, falsely implying that some people are born homosexual, or born to mutilate themselves by sex-change surgery? Also, no ban on counseling for teens who have same-sex attractions. And the local media, if they tried to distort the truth in the current popular fashion, would find local advertisers withdraw.
“Imagine the freedom to live the truth. No one in such cities would be arrested or sued or fired or demoted over marriage, or have a TV show canceled, or be kicked out of grad school, or lose a consulting contract, or be mocked, or given a failing grade for supporting only man/woman marriage, or be prevented from preaching the whole Gospel. Marriage sanctuary cities are a wild proposal, but why not? It’s not just a good idea – it’s the law.” – Hate group leader Linda Harvey,
“Since we are beginning to see violations of constitutional rights based on objections to homosexuality as marriage, I believe there’s a clear precedent for establishing sanctuary cities for authentic, lawful, man/woman marriage. Think about how great life would be in those cities. After all, unlike the defiance of immigration law, these cities would be upholding the actual law under our actual Constitution, not the imaginary one in the mind of Justice Anthony Kennedy. So, why not cities that uphold a standing, just law?
“Family life would be much healthier and safer in these cities. Keep out the vile ‘gay-pride’ parades as well as harassment lawsuits against bakers and florists. And how about no pro-homosexual lessons in school, falsely implying that some people are born homosexual, or born to mutilate themselves by sex-change surgery? Also, no ban on counseling for teens who have same-sex attractions. And the local media, if they tried to distort the truth in the current popular fashion, would find local advertisers withdraw.
“Imagine the freedom to live the truth. No one in such cities would be arrested or sued or fired or demoted over marriage, or have a TV show canceled, or be kicked out of grad school, or lose a consulting contract, or be mocked, or given a failing grade for supporting only man/woman marriage, or be prevented from preaching the whole Gospel. Marriage sanctuary cities are a wild proposal, but why not? It’s not just a good idea – it’s the law.” – Hate group leader Linda Harvey,
