I Can't Bate

[dargelos]

Classical music is an artform that requires complete concentration by the listener in order for it to be enjoyed fully. The same can be said for pornographic movies. For a deeply satisfying experience, the wanker must immerse himself in a world of cock, more cock and much more cock. Any interuptions and distractions mean the magic spell is broken. Which is why my enjoyment of filthy videos has become dimminished. There are too many other things to think about, I cannot look at the porn for long without the irresistable urge to go back to my news feeds and analysis. Then going back to the porn it's like, "Oh no, not more gorgeous boys having fun. Don't they have anything better to do. Same old same old monotonous pleasure."
Does anyone else recognise this first world problem?

 

[dudophile]

Not really, although I do find myself switching between scenes, often. Too many hot guys to stay true to just one, LOL.

 

[Shelter]

I will understand. Too much porn - and porn starts to be boring. Always the same in and out. But suddenly there is a couple which is really in what they are doing and you can see and feel that the chemistry between them is REAL and if you look in their faces you can see they really feel what they are playing. And than, in this moment, it is not only porn - you are watching a couple which is totally enjoying themselves. But such scenes are really more than seldom. Very often you can see the models with absolutely languidly faces and that what they are doing is only a boring "in-and-out".

But perhaps, like in every job, the daily routine will make your job boring. Sex is something beautiful - but day by day and perhaps with a partner you don't like or you should do what you don't like? It will deaden your horniness, and perhaps you need a pill to get a hard one.

Conclusion: a really good and horny true porn flic is very seldom.

 

[clemh01]

A lot of porn is poorly shot, poorly lit (whether too dimly lit or too bright) and the performers are just going through the motions. Having a director and performers who actually care and truly seem to be enjoying what they're doing is relatively unusual. I've lately found a bunch of the porn produced by Co(ky B@ys to be excellent. They have gotten good write ups in New York Magazine and a number of other mainstream legit magazines praising their quality and the beauty of their performers. So far I have no reason to disagree.

 

[gorgik9]

A lot of porn is poorly shot, poorly lit (whether too dimly lit or too bright) and the performers are just going through the motions. Having a director and performers who actually care and truly seem to be enjoying what they're doing is relatively unusual. I've lately found a bunch of the porn produced by Co(ky B@ys to be excellent. They have gotten good write ups in New York Magazine and a number of other mainstream legit magazines praising their quality and the beauty of their performers. So far I have no reason to disagree.

I agree that C0ckI B0Is and the main man behind this studio (J4ke J4xon) has managed to put out quite a few videos moving away from the worst strangulating stereotypicality. But J4xon and his friends are fighting awfully narrowminded formats, and my main argument will be, that when the gay porn studios moved from DVD to Streaming as their main distribution technology, this also ment a forbidding stereotyping of the format, the gay porn flick. The idea of what a gay porn video was and what it should be.

So what should it be? A video 20-25 minutes long, two boys on a bed in the studio and then we get the standard sequence of kissing-sucking-fucking-ming. If you've seen this 25 minutes sequence a few hundred times it will necessarily get boring. Really boring.

This evening I've spent a lot of time looking at some clips from the best gay pornographer of all times, Jean Daniel Cadinot. God allmighty what a difference!!! The Number One characteristic of Cadinot's productions was: VARIATION!!! Variation from every angle, on every level. One Cadinot porn movie is remarcably different from the other Cadinot movies.

And it's my firm belief that Cadinot could keep up his standards mainly because he never ever made more than four movies annually, and in many years from 1980 to 2008 he made less than four. Variation presupposes time to think, time to experiment, time to improvise.