Porn from the past and today

[Shelter]

Hello, I come again with a question. It's about the porn films of the past and present.
I think when I watch the old porn, I really see normal young and older men, nice and hairy and with normal cocks. They usually look like the guy next door. You can identify with them. Their bodies look like the body of you or me. The length of their cocks is also comparable to those of normal young men today. They didn't fuck like machines either – but you want to believe their love for their partner.
Today they are steeled, muscular young men with enormous cocks in terms of length and thickness. Mostly clean-shaven – which particularly bothers me. The films today are well equipped, the environment the premises. But the actors are really cool to look at, but they are simply not available.

What is your opinion on this?

 

[mtndewagain]

Hello, I come again with a question. It's about the porn films of the past and present.
I think when I watch the old porn, I really see normal young and older men, nice and hairy and with normal cocks. They usually look like the guy next door. You can identify with them. Their bodies look like the body of you or me. The length of their cocks is also comparable to those of normal young men today. They didn't fuck like machines either – but you want to believe their love for their partner.
Today they are steeled, muscular young men with enormous cocks in terms of length and thickness. Mostly clean-shaven – which particularly bothers me. The films today are well equipped, the environment the premises. But the actors are really cool to look at, but they are simply not available.

What is your opinion on this?

Some of the porn was as you describe ... but some "studios" such as F@lcon and specifically C@lt featured guys who looked like the just came off the stage from a bodybuilding competition. Also there was very little ethnic diversity -unless it had racist references.

But certain "studios" today (M@N eg) have some scenes that are unwatchable for he reasons you give as well as the ridiculous scenarios ...

In short ... No More Gooners in front of my salad !

 

[Shelter]

Some of the porn was as you describe ... but some "studios" such as F@lcon and specifically C@lt featured guys who looked like the just came off the stage from a bodybuilding competition. Also there was very little ethnic diversity -unless it had racist references.

But certain "studios" today (M@N eg) have some scenes that are unwatchable the reasons you give as well as the ridiculous scenarios ...

In short ... No More Gooners in front of my salad !

So true what you have said. I would like to see more normal figures - so I can identify with them. I'm not a meatball and not a Schwarzenegger - but someone in between as all of us. Why it isn't possible to make porn movies with such models?

 

[dargelos]

In the olden days of vhs, big muscles and big cocks were a thing too, just that you couldnt see them so clearly on the badly lit grainy screen. What has changed so much, as well as the sharpness of the camerawork, is the greater proportion of the porno output that is no longer made by big studios. Some of it by models working for tips and trying to sell subscriptions, sometimes by amateurs who make porn just for fun and dont make any money. The studios reaction is to make their product more excessive, as you have complained about. My reaction is that I dont want to see men banging away like an express train with no warmth and no affection. You can find genuine boy next door types among the tons of home made porn, the price is the time you have to spend searching through all the useless 17 second clips to find sometime long enough to get into. Good stuff is out there, you just need to find it.

 

[dudophile]

I found that the old videos were usually too short, with regards to the actual "event" of fucking, which is why most people want to watch porn. But, with the given technology of the time, the early internet didn't have enough time available for being able to let you watch a long video. For that, there was the XXX movie theater, but even there, the actual sex was kept pretty short, and in the 70s and early 80s there wasn't much dialogue either, so they filled it with loud, and very often annoying music. Besides, if I'm going to watch porn, I'd rather see a really hot looking with a ripped body. That gets me off, although I realize that's not the case for everyone. I don't want to see an average body. For me, it's a fantasy. I, personally, don't really care about the size of a guy's dick, even though I may comment and joke about it. Although I will bottom, so that we both can enjoy topping, I'm not interested in taking a larger than life dick, as it does nothing for me but hurt. I certainly wouldn't turn a guy down, if I find him hot, but it's nothing I go out of my way for, unlike some guys who won't even look at a guy. if he isn't overly endowed.

I still want to see a scene where the performers really seem to be into each other, rather than just doing it for the paycheck. So, overall, I prefer the modern scenes, but don't give me those unsexy scenes, silly scenes that M€N has morphed into. I was a member for years, until they were bought up by those idiots, who thought that type of filming was what a horny man wanted to see, instead of hot men having hot sex. I was fortunate enough to actually have a number of encounters with some of those hot F₳£CO₦ men in those days, although I didn't know that they were porn stars until sometime later. I love LA!