Thanks for this:
http://www.gayheaven.org/showthread.php?p=2054106#post2054106
I’m looking for any .gifs or videos of growing cocks (time lapse if that’s what it takes), as long as those cocks belong to studs. I’m not into old cocks or flab for abs or anything like that.
Ideally, I’m looking for videos of growing cocks shot so you can see the stud in profile from his head to his calves. Preferably with his pelvis thrust out so that, once fully erect, his cock sticks out as far as possible. An enlarging-cock video filmed in that pose, where you can see most of the stud’s body, would be extremely hot, in my view.
I love poses that make the erect (or growing) cock look as long and big as possible.
Most unimaginative porn-makers, though, will film this kind of video in close-up so all you can see is the cock and balls, no view of the beautiful stud at all except for that. Boring. And frustrating too.
One porn critic on this site screamed, “PULL THE CAMERA BACK!” I couldn't agree more. If you try to find out who’s in a porn flick by watching it in a media player, 9 times out of 10 when you click on the film-progress line you’ll see nothing but boring close-ups, usually super close-ups or boring cock-in-hole shots filmed at microscopic proximity. Finally, at some point, you will click on the progress line somewhere that actually shows somebody’s face or a full-body shot so you can identify the beautiful model and drool over his actual body, not the tiny parts of his skin.
Close-ups and super close-ups are mostly filler (pardon the pun) designed to rip off viewers. It doesn’t benefit the models either. Displaying them fully might make them more popular. Showing close-ups 90% of the time only benefits dermatologists, I would think. Yuck.
Porn flicks don’t NEED to be 20 minutes anymore, so there’s no need for filler. Five to eight minutes is plenty of time to show everything hot that happens. Cut out the filler!
Because of the Net, the business model for everything is changing. That includes porn. There’s a lot of wailing over lost revenues, but the global porn industry is pulling in about $97 billion per year and growing. That ain't hay. The winners are those who adapt to the new realities. Same in the music industry. Lots of money is still being made---just not in the same way as before.
Most porn models probably aren’t getting paid as much as previously, though. Eventually, maybe all porn will be home-made. Why not? A lot of amateur porn is already as good or better than the “slickly” produced crap. A lot of amateurs DO engage in the kind of cock display I’ve been ranting about for I don’t know how long. That’s what young, horny studs do---show off and strut their stuff, either on webcam or for themselves in mirrors.
Sometimes it amazes me how out of touch the porn industry is with reality. If the entire industry goes amateur, I will welcome that.
http://www.gayheaven.org/showthread.php?p=2054106#post2054106
I’m looking for any .gifs or videos of growing cocks (time lapse if that’s what it takes), as long as those cocks belong to studs. I’m not into old cocks or flab for abs or anything like that.
Ideally, I’m looking for videos of growing cocks shot so you can see the stud in profile from his head to his calves. Preferably with his pelvis thrust out so that, once fully erect, his cock sticks out as far as possible. An enlarging-cock video filmed in that pose, where you can see most of the stud’s body, would be extremely hot, in my view.
I love poses that make the erect (or growing) cock look as long and big as possible.
Most unimaginative porn-makers, though, will film this kind of video in close-up so all you can see is the cock and balls, no view of the beautiful stud at all except for that. Boring. And frustrating too.
One porn critic on this site screamed, “PULL THE CAMERA BACK!” I couldn't agree more. If you try to find out who’s in a porn flick by watching it in a media player, 9 times out of 10 when you click on the film-progress line you’ll see nothing but boring close-ups, usually super close-ups or boring cock-in-hole shots filmed at microscopic proximity. Finally, at some point, you will click on the progress line somewhere that actually shows somebody’s face or a full-body shot so you can identify the beautiful model and drool over his actual body, not the tiny parts of his skin.
Close-ups and super close-ups are mostly filler (pardon the pun) designed to rip off viewers. It doesn’t benefit the models either. Displaying them fully might make them more popular. Showing close-ups 90% of the time only benefits dermatologists, I would think. Yuck.
Porn flicks don’t NEED to be 20 minutes anymore, so there’s no need for filler. Five to eight minutes is plenty of time to show everything hot that happens. Cut out the filler!
Because of the Net, the business model for everything is changing. That includes porn. There’s a lot of wailing over lost revenues, but the global porn industry is pulling in about $97 billion per year and growing. That ain't hay. The winners are those who adapt to the new realities. Same in the music industry. Lots of money is still being made---just not in the same way as before.
Most porn models probably aren’t getting paid as much as previously, though. Eventually, maybe all porn will be home-made. Why not? A lot of amateur porn is already as good or better than the “slickly” produced crap. A lot of amateurs DO engage in the kind of cock display I’ve been ranting about for I don’t know how long. That’s what young, horny studs do---show off and strut their stuff, either on webcam or for themselves in mirrors.
Sometimes it amazes me how out of touch the porn industry is with reality. If the entire industry goes amateur, I will welcome that.
shot.
